subject_line
I hereby Certify I am an duly Elected CC2009 Delegate:
*
I Am a CC2009 Elected Delegate
First Name
*
Last Name
*
Street Address
*
Address Line 2
City
*
State
*
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Washington DC
Zip Code
*
Phone Number
*
Email Address
*
I AGREE with the proposed "Agenda & Schedule of Events"
which establishes the base schedule/timetable, content, objectives
and deliberative process for the CC2009 proceedings
(Recently posted, 10-27-09):
*
Agree with proposed Agenda/Schedule
Agree, subject to specific comments provided below
Disagree with draft, comments provided below
Disagree with this plan & have a better plan, ready to deploy at CC2009
I AGREE with the Vision/Strategy framework for CC2009:
*
Agree with Vision/Strategy
Agree, but subject to my comments below
Disagree with the strategy
Disagree and have a better strategy developed for CC2009
Please choose the best answer for each question.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
The schedule/timetable is about right given the time/cost constraints and the deliberative process to be executed
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
The event content and process appears balanced so as to achieve all stated goals for CC2009
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
The daily timetable & activity flow should be attainable
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
The overall deliberative process for the Delegates & Congress as whole is adequately designed to support the objectives
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
Although initially focused on a number of key, well-Petitioned Violations of the Constitution, the draft process expressly provides for the introduction and full consideration of additional subjects
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
The draft process should result in a formal Record of Constitutional Violations and Failed Petitions necessary to morally and lawfully justify further peaceful curative actions by the People
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
The draft process should result in a potent set of Remedial Instructions to be directed at various government officials
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
The draft process should result in specific Remedial Resolutions the People can take individually and en masse to secure Redress
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
The draft deliberative process creates NO barrier for the introduction and full consideration of Remedial Resolutions potentially applicable against BOTH state and federal entities
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
The draft CC2009 deliberative process creates NO barrier for the introduction and full consideration of alternative, even highly controversial, Remedial Resolutions
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
The CC2009 will achieve a signifcant milestone in the peaceful restoration of Liberty and Constitutional Order
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
N/A
YOUR ADDITIONAL COMMENTS &/or CONCERNS:
0/3000 characters
Powered by
Report abuse